Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has a score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 score. HTC U11's design has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but it's just a bit lighter. The HTC U11 features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a bit sharper display than HTC U11, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger display. Motorola Edge 40 Neo takes much better pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.