Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Interstellar Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is slightly better than HTC U11's 77.6 overall score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is notably newer than HTC U11's, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little sharper screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The HTC U11 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images and video, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior memory to store more apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 53% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.