Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than the HTC U11, with a global score of 81.9 against 77.6. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is way newer than HTC U11's, although it's just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a brighter screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display and a bit lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px, it also counts with a larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. HTC U11 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 44% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures much better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.