Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than HTC U11's global score of 77.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a much newer cellphone than the HTC U11, but it's just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. The HTC U11 counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than HTC U11, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much worse number of pixels in each screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a greater camera than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments and a much better resolution back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.