Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than HTC U11's overall score of 77.6. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is newer than the HTC U11, it is just a bit thicker and heavier. HTC U11 has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a lot lesser pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster video frame rates, a way better resolution back facing camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.