Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Smoke black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is a little bit better than Moto G Power, with a global score of 77.6 against 76.1. The HTC U11 is an a lot older phone than the Moto G Power, but HTC made it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The HTC U11 has a bit more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better screen pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a better memory for applications and games than HTC U11, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The HTC U11 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Power. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G Power captures slightly better pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
The Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the HTC U11, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Power, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.