Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-05-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has a global score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. The HTC U11 is an a little thicker and a little heavier cellphone than Moto Z Force. HTC U11 features a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the HTC U11 also has a higher number of cores (and faster).
The HTC U11 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z Force. Both have a higher pixel amount in each screen inch, a same size display and the same exact 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Moto Z Force has a little bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto Z Force also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a very superior memory for games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force has just a bit better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 17% more battery size.
HTC U11 costs a bit more money than the Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.