Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Oxford blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the HTC U11's 77.6 overall score. The Motorola One 5G is a notably newer phone than the HTC U11, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The HTC U11 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels density.
Motorola One 5G counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. HTC U11 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola One 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores.
Motorola One 5G counts with a much better camera than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola One 5G costs a lot more money than HTC U11, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.