Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than HTC U11's global score of 77.6. Motorola One Hyper's body is much newer than HTC U11's, but it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC U11 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The HTC U11 has a little bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
Motorola One Hyper counts with longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity. Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save some money and buy the HTC U11, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.