Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-05-18 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than the HTC U11, getting an 80 score against 77.6. Motorola One Zoom's construction is extremely newer than the HTC U11's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. HTC U11 features a little faster processor than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
HTC U11 has a little sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola One Zoom takes much better photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Zoom counts with better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U11. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the HTC U11, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.