Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Meteor grey |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a little bit better than HTC U11, getting a overall score of 80.3 against 77.6. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW construction is noticeably newer than the HTC U11's, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. HTC U11 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. HTC U11 features just a bit better performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a very superior camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way larger back camera sensor and a way better resolution camera.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a way better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U11. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy HTC U11, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.