Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is a bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 global score. The Nokia XR20 body is much newer than HTC U11's, but it's a lot heavier and thicker. The HTC U11 features just a bit better hardware performance than Nokia XR20, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The HTC U11 features just a bit better looking screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher display density. The Nokia XR20 has a little bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures.
Nokia XR20 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC U11, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 has a much better battery life than HTC U11, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U11. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the HTC U11, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.