Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Ocean |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 has a general score of 79.7, which is a bit better than the HTC U11's 77.6 global score. The OPPO Find X2 design has the same thickness than HTC U11, but it's just a little bit heavier. OPPO Find X2 has a slightly better looking display than HTC U11, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a larger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bit more powerful processor than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 takes better photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the OPPO Find X2 also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X2 features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 features a way better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.