Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Ocean |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than the HTC U11's overall score of 77.6. Even though OPPO Find X2 Pro is much newer than HTC U11, it is thicker and heavier. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little sharper display than HTC U11, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better memory for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better processor than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 42% bigger battery capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot better camera than HTC U11, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.