Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a general score of 77.6 against 77. The HTC U11 is a a little lighter but a bit thicker phone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better performance than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little sharper screen than HTC U11, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a superior memory to install applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures much better photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution. HTC U11 has a way better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.