Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, with a score of 77.6 against 77.4. The HTC U11 body is lighter and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, even though it was released 7 years before. HTC U11 has a bit better display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than HTC U11, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. HTC U11 counts with a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A15 5G features a much longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A15 5G features just a bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it costs more than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.