Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than HTC U11, having an 84.6 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's design is incredibly newer than HTC U11's, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC U11 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy A22 5G features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The HTC U11 counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G takes a little bit better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.