Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than HTC U11, getting a 79.9 score against 77.6. Galaxy A25 5G is a noticeably newer phone than the HTC U11, although it is just a little thicker and heavier. Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper display than HTC U11, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. HTC U11 counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 67% more battery size. Galaxy A25 5G has a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and images and a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.