Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is a bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 general score. Even though the Galaxy A35 5G is newer than HTC U11, it is just a little thicker and heavier. HTC U11 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixels density.
HTC U11 features a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A35 5G features a better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy A35 5G has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.