Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Prism cube black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than HTC U11's 77.6 global score. Galaxy A51 5G's design is much newer than HTC U11's, but it's just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. HTC U11 has just a bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much greater memory for applications and games than HTC U11, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. HTC U11 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity. Galaxy A51 5G captures better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is more expensive than HTC U11, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.