Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than the HTC U11's overall score of 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is notably newer than HTC U11's, although it is heavier and a little thicker. The HTC U11 features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The HTC U11 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better storage for apps and games than HTC U11, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.