Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the HTC U11, with a overall score of 91.3 against 77.6. The Galaxy A52 5G design is newer than the HTC U11's, but it is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. The HTC U11 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
HTC U11 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better screen density. The Galaxy A52 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.