Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Prism bricks black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than HTC U11, with a 92.9 score against 77.6. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a notably newer device than HTC U11, although it's just a bit thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster processor than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
HTC U11 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a very superior camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than HTC U11, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.