Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than HTC U11, having a general score of 88.1 against 77.6. Galaxy F62's construction is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than HTC U11. HTC U11 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features much more storage for games and applications than HTC U11, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The HTC U11 counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Galaxy F62 has a lot better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality photos.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 133% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.