Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-05-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the HTC U11, having a 97.6 score against 77.6. Galaxy Fold's body is much newer and thinner than the HTC U11's, although it's extremely heavier. The HTC U11 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy Fold features a little bit better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold captures slightly better photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels back-facing camera, a 0.39 inches sensor and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger aperture to take better low light photography and better video frame rates.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Fold features a very superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 46% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U11. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the HTC U11, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.