Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than HTC U11, having a 90.8 score against 77.6. The Galaxy Note 20 construction is extremely newer than HTC U11's, but it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
HTC U11 has just a bit better display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with slightly more memory for applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 takes slightly better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the HTC U11, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.