Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than the HTC U11, with an 81.2 score against 77.6. Galaxy Note 3 is a way older and a little bit thicker cellphone than the HTC U11, but Samsung was able to make it just a little bit lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little more vivid screen than HTC U11, because although it has a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot lesser pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger display.
HTC U11 has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 128 GB. HTC U11 has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The HTC U11 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a camera with a worse 12 MP resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light situations and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.