Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-05-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is better than the HTC U11's global score of 77.6. Samsung Galaxy Note10's body has the same thickness than HTC U11, but it is a little lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little faster CPU than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The HTC U11 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel count in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Galaxy Note10 counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video resolution and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U11. If you want to save some dollars, you can get HTC U11, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.