Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than HTC U11, having a 77.7 score against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a way older and a little thicker phone than the HTC U11, but Samsung made it a little lighter anyway. HTC U11 features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has more cores and more RAM.
HTC U11 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The HTC U11 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a larger sensor.
The HTC U11 has a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. Galaxy Note3 has just a little better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 7 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.