Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-05-18 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a bit better than HTC U11, having a 77.6 score against 77.6. Despite being the best we are comparing, it must be told that it's also a much older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone. The HTC U11 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC U11 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U11 counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560px resolution, the HTC U11 also counts with a just a little greater pixels density. Galaxy Note4 counts with a camera that is very similar to the HTC U11 one, because although the Galaxy Note4 has a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos and a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 16 mega-pixels resolution.
The HTC U11 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 128 GB, the HTC U11 also has more internal storage. Galaxy Note4 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 3220mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.