Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than the HTC U11's overall score of 77.6. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way newer than the HTC U11, it is thicker and way heavier. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a display that is just as good as HTC U11's screen, because although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a just a little inferior pixel count per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better 108 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a much higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC U11. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy HTC U11, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.