Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than HTC U11, having a global score of 95.4 against 77.6. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is noticeably newer than HTC U11, it is thicker and notably heavier. HTC U11 and Galaxy S22 Ultra feature similar processors, and although the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a more vivid display than HTC U11, because although it has a bit lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC U11. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC U11, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.