Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than HTC U11's global score of 77.6. Although Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit heavier than HTC U11, it's a little thinner and also notably newer. HTC U11 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures clearer pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a 12 mega pixels back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better battery life than HTC U11, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U11. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the HTC U11, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.