Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the HTC U11's 77.6 general score. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a much newer and thinner device than the HTC U11, but it's also a lot heavier. HTC U11 counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels back facing camera and the same video definition, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and better video frame rates.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U11. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the HTC U11, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.