Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the HTC U11, with a general score of 90.6 against 77.6. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is noticeably heavier than HTC U11, it's thinner and notably newer. HTC U11 has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 47% larger battery size. HTC U11 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution camera, the HTC U11 also has a much bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.