Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than HTC U11, with a score of 86.6 against 77.6. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a extremely newer phone than the HTC U11, although it is extremely heavier and way thicker. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U11 counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 4720mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.