Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Blasting black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than HTC U11, with a 90.1 score against 77.6. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is way newer than HTC U11, it's notably heavier and noticeably thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
HTC U11 counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels in each screen inch. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a way better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.