Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-05-18 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has a general score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's overall score of 76. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, HTC U11 is a just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker device than Xiaomi Mi Note 2. The HTC U11 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores.
HTC U11 counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of screen. The HTC U11 shoots better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a back camera with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, HTC U11 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.