Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a global score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 global score. Xiaomi Poco M3's construction is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than HTC U11. The HTC U11 counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The HTC U11 has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 100 percent more battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a slightly better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.