Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is slightly better than the HTC U11, getting a score of 78.2 against 77.6. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is incredibly newer than HTC U11, it is just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. The HTC U11 features a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a little sharper screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little worse count of pixels per display inch and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bigger screen. HTC U11 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the HTC U11 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.
HTC U11 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a much longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.