Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a global score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than HTC U11's overall score of 77.6. Although it's the best we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device than the HTC U11. HTC U11 counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better display density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features just a bit more memory to store more apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a processor that is just as good as HTC U11's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
HTC U11 has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a much less MP camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a really longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.