Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is much better than HTC U11, with a global score of 86.1 against 77.6. Even being the best we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a just a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than HTC U11. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit faster processor than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has more RAM memory.
HTC U11 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better display pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures way better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.