Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than HTC U11, having an 81.1 score against 77.6. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is noticeably newer than HTC U11's, although it's thicker and somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a CPU that is very similar to HTC U11's processor, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
HTC U11 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit more expensive than HTC U11, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.