Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-05-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the HTC U11's global score of 77.6. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a a little heavier phone than the HTC U11, but they have the same thickness. The HTC U11 has a little bit better display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per screen inch.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because it has 192 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has improved battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 33% more battery capacity. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more MP and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U11. If you are trying to save some money, you can get HTC U11, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.