Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-05-18 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black, Ochre and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a general score of 77.6 against 76.6. HTC U11 is a a little bit lighter cellphone than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. HTC U11 has a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a camera that's just as good as the HTC U11 one, and although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot larger sensor, they both have the same video frame rate, the same (Quad HD / 2K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with improved battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.