Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-30 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than HTC U12 Life, with a general score of 88.1 against 74.4. The Apple iPhone X design is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than HTC U12 Life, despite of the fact that it was released only 10 months before. The Apple iPhone X counts with a sharper display than HTC U12 Life, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite better pixels number per inch of screen.
Apple iPhone X has a better performing processing unit than HTC U12 Life, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. IPhone X has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U12 Life, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The HTC U12 Life features longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity. IPhone X has a little bit better camera than HTC U12 Life, because although it has a lower video resolution and a way less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.