Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-30 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the HTC U12 Life's global score of 74.4. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ and HTC U12 Life were released only 3 months apart, the LG V35 ThinQ is a little lighter and thinner. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a greater pixels density. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U12 Life has just a bit better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and the same resolution back camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.