Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-30 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is way better than the HTC U12 Life, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 74.4. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while HTC U12 Life has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though Galaxy A51 5G is newer than HTC U12 Life, it is a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit better display than HTC U12 Life, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little larger display and a quite higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy A51 5G takes better pictures and videos than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have the same video quality, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior memory to store more games and applications than HTC U12 Life, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has superior battery duration than HTC U12 Life, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.