Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-08-30 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than HTC U12 Life, with a 91.3 score against 74.4. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while HTC U12 Life has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy A52 5G is a a bit heavier device than HTC U12 Life, but both of them are equally thin.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more vivid display than HTC U12 Life, because it has a quite greater pixel amount in each inch of display, a little bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy A52 5G features a bit faster CPU than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U12 Life, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a way more MP back camera and a bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features superior battery lifetime than HTC U12 Life, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.