Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-08-30 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than HTC U12 Life's 74.4 overall score. These devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version while HTC U12 Life has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is notably newer than HTC U12 Life, it is way heavier and just a little thicker.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than HTC U12 Life, because it has a just a little higher screen density, a little bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better performance than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than HTC U12 Life, because it has a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and video and a lot higher video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC U12 Life, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior battery performance than HTC U12 Life, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.